Thursday, November 24, 2016



GAMBLING  AND CRIME



Addictive behaviour and its link with criminal activity has long been an area of research interest (e.g., alcohol, and to a lesser extent narcotic drug use). More recently, the same arguments have been used in relation to links between crime and problem gambling addiction. For instance, studies from various regions worldwide suggest an association between criminal activity and easily accessible gambling, yet, despite growth in the commercial gambling industry, relatively little is known about the nature, extent or impact of gambling-related crime. Problem gamblers tend to be individuals who are chronically and progressively unable to resist impulses to gamble and that their gambling compromises, disrupts or damages family, personal, and vocational pursuits. The behaviour increases under times of stress and associated features include lying to obtain money, committing crimes (e.g. forgery, embezzlement, fraud etc.), and concealment from others of the extent of the individual's gambling activities (Griffiths, 2006). Criminal behaviour is most commonly associated with problem gamblers because problem gamblers spend more than their disposable income and often have to resort to criminal activity as a way of getting money to carry on gambling and repay associated debt problems. Law enforcement officials claim that gambling expansion inevitably leads to “an increase in enterprise crime and money laundering activity particularly relating to casinos...and an increase in illegal activities such as loan sharking, extortion and frauds” (Proke, 1994; p 61). Public opinion polls also tend to reflect a general perception that a correlation exists between widely available gambling and crime. For instance, a Canadian study by Azmier (2000) found that 64% of participants agreed that gambling expansion leads to an increase in crime.

Male gamblers are more likely to become violent, and as problem gaming worsens, the intensity of the violence becomes more severe. That’s according to a new study conducted by the University of Lincoln in England and published by the Addiction journal.
Researchers evaluated 3,025 men ranging from 18 to 64 years of age from various socio-economic backgrounds to determine if they had ever engaged in violent behavior. Violent behavior was defined as a physical altercation, assault, deliberately attacking someone, using a weapon, and other malicious acts.
The study also inquired on whether the violence was performed under the influence of drugs or alcohol, and asked respondents about their personal gambling habits.
Eighty percent, or 2,420 of the respondents, said they had gambled at some point in their lifetime. Shockingly, 50 percent of pathological gamblers reported being in a physical altercation in the last five years. And 45 percent of problem gamblers and 28 percent of those who identified themselves as casual gamblers admitted to being involved in some sort of fight over the same time period. Comparatively, only 19 percent of non-gambling males reported being involved in a violent situation.


According to a reserch of gambler’s anonymous (GA) members, 46% of respondents indicated that they had committed an illegal act. These crimes were frequently armed robbery, theft or fraud (such as writing bad checks), and other studies have shown that domestic violenc-,, abuse-, and neglect-related crime rates are also higher amongst problem gamblers.In fact, problem and pathological gamblers are between 3 and 3.5 times more likely to be arrested and/or spend time in jail! 
Gambling addiction is astronomically higher amongst inmates as well. One study estimated that problem gambling is 300% to 500% more prevalent amongst prisoners than in the general population. More recently, some deputies of the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department – which operates the largest prison system in the country – gave unofficial estimates that 40% to 60% of inmates in low- and medium-security jails presented with signs of problem gambling – as much as 16 times the rate of the general population! Gambling addicts are also 2 to 7 times more likely to take illegal drugs, binge drink and smoke. Many experts have also observed that they drive high, drunk, distracted or sleep deprived far more frequently than the general population.

Gambling-related crime tends to relate to four distinct types (Smith, Wynne & Hartnagel, 2003). These are: 
• Illegal gambling – Gambling activity that is counter to jurisdictional regulations statutes, such as operating without a gambling license, cheating at play, etc.; 
• Criminogenic problem gambling – Activities such as forgery, embezzlement, and fraud, typically committed by problem gamblers to support a gambling addiction; 
• Gambling venue crime – Crimes that occur in and around gambling locations, such as loan sharking, money laundering, passing counterfeit currency, theft, assault, prostitution and vandalism;
 • Family abuse – Victimization of family members caused by another family member’s gambling involvement, (e.g., domestic violence, child neglect, suicide, and home invasion). 



Why do some problem gamblers turn to crime?

Generally, because they experience the following sequence of events: asset losses; accumulating debts; exhausting legal means of obtaining funds including drawing on savings and retirement funds; borrowing from family and friends; cash advances on credit cards; and loans from financial institutions or “loan sharks” - until committing a crime becomes their only option. Although the evidence is anecdotal, loan sharking is widespread in casinos. Problem gamblers who use loan sharks generally exacerbate their troubles because debts are magnified, as is the stress from worrying about not being able to repay the loan. 

The American National Gambling Impact Study examined the possible causal relationship between problem gambling and criminal behaviour and indicates that among those who have not gambled in the past year, only 7% have ever been in prison. In contrast, three times as many individuals who have been problem gamblers at any point during their lifetime (21%) have been incarcerated. 

SOURCE: http://www.calpg.org/impacts-on-crime-and-suicide/
SOURCE: http://www.internetjournalofcriminology.com/Griffiths_Betting_Shops_and_Crime.pdf

  

No comments: